Skip to main content

Behavioural symptoms of mental health disorder such as depression among young people using Instagram: a systematic review


There is a growing debate on the linkage between social networking platforms and mental health disorder, such as depressive behaviour or depression. However, the relationship between Instagram use and depression or depressive behaviour has not been exhaustively examined. This review aims to examine these two variables. Only peer-reviewed journal articles that are published between October 2010 and December 2018 were sought in central and journal databases. Studies were selected based on predefined criteria and assessed for risk of bias and quality of evidence using GRADE. One thousand eight hundred fifty-six studies were the outcome of the search, out of which 9 meets all eligible criteria. Of the 9 studies, three-quarter was published between 2017 and 2018, covering five continents: (North America: 3; Asia: 2; Australia: 2; South America: 1, Europe: 1). The final included studies broadly examined young Instagram users between the age of 19 and 35. The synthesis affirmed a linkage between Instagram and symptoms of depression or depressive behaviour. Variables that moderate this relationship are social comparison, self-esteem built on validation and approval of others, social media dependence, gender, negative or insufficient feedback, poor self-rated attractiveness, Instagram broadcasting and loneliness, younger users and risk of anxiety, and the number of strangers that users follow. There is a strong relationship between Instagram use and mental health disorders such as depression or depressive behaviour; however, no in-depth direct causality is proven yet. Further studies are needed to unravel the direct causality puzzles.


The world of social media, which involves using computer-based technology that fosters sharing information, thoughts, videos, pictures and ideas through virtual networks and communities, is changing and evolving. Instagram, a visual platform for capturing and sharing video and photo, remains one of the fastest-growing social media platforms [1]. Compared with other social network sites, Fig. 1 revealed that while Instagram and Facebook continue to experience an upward trend, twitter experienced a static movement. This is consistent with the argument that the visual platform has experienced significant growth in the last decade with over one billion monthly active users and about 71% of the one billion users under 35 years old [2]. This aligns with the assertion that “the most common age range is between 25-34 years of age, followed by users between 18-24 years of age” [3]. Arguably, Instagram is engrossed with active users, just like other social network sites.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Comparative graph showing number of active users worldwide between 2013 and 2018 (compiled from [2])

Instagram has evolved to become an influential and persuasive information avenue through which users form connections [4]. This view suggests that Instagram allows users to seek other people’s opinions and views to make informed decisions. Some users could be perceived as less confident in making their own decisions, thus putting their trust in others [5]. While Instagram is regarded as an essential part of young people’s daily lives, there are several dangers linked with Instagram use, specifically, adverse effects on mental health. Despite Instagram being a means to facilitate convenient connections with family members, old and new friends, it can be harmful to users’ mental health [6]. Although, studies have linked users of social media to behaviour associated with mental health disorder such as depression, anxiety, poorer sleep quality, lower self-esteem, inattention, and hyperactivity — often in teens and adolescents; however, Instagram seem to have disproportionate negative impact than others [1, 6].

Instagram impacts users’ self-esteem and influences their levels of loneliness and depression [7]. In this day and age, Instagram users’ self-esteem is often influenced by bloggers and influencers’ way of life as portrayed online [8]. This is because users are sometimes addicted to influencers and bloggers who directly influence their followers [9]. Bhat [10] argued that addiction to Instagram is a predictor of depression. Similarly, Instagram is perceived as a damaging social media platform that impacts young adults’ mental health, hence suggesting that Instagram has become a problematic space [11, 12].

Depression is one of the most widespread and common illnesses globally, with more than 300 million people affected [13]. It significantly reduces the patient’s quality of life and may lead to diminished role functioning, medical morbidity, and even suicide [14]. Depression is the leading cause of disability worldwide and is confirmed to have worldwide importance [15]. Its persistence among patients, one-third of whom diagnosed with major depressive disorder, display either a period of recurrence or recovery or even sustained symptoms over many years [16]. For this review, we characterize depression by the standards and symptoms laid out in Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5), defining depression as a period of at least 2 weeks in which a person exhibits a depressed mood or loss of interest or pleasure in daily activities [17]. This can be accompanied by insomnia, eating disorders, lack of focus or diminished feelings of self-worth (ibid.). The DSM-5 clearly describes criteria for diagnosis of depression.

Instagram is a social networking platform that offers users opportunities to create, connect, communicate, discover and share photos and short videos as pleases. The users can choose photographic filters, which alter the tone and color of the image. Users can search and subscribe to other users in a personally curated feed, who share contents, comments and links. Instagram service reached one billion monthly active users 8 years after it was first launched [18].

In the past, research has linked social networking platforms to mental health problems, such as feelings of isolation, body image concerns or depression. However, the relationship has not been exhaustively examined systematically [19, 20]. Hence, this review aims to chart the linkage between Instagram and mental health disorder such as depression among users, especially young people.


Search strategy

A literature search was performed using general databases and the search terms in Table 1 (English) and Table 2 (German). Peer-reviewed studies written in English and German languages and published between 1.10.2010 and 31.12.2018 were sought in PubMed via MEDLINE, EBSCOhost, Google Scholar, PsycINFO, Sage Journal, Oxford Academic, Science Direct, Taylor & Francis, Springer Link, JSTOR and Blackwell Wiley. The search terms for English and German were developed according to Population/Participants, Intervention, Comparison and Outcome (PICO) [21, 22].

Table 1 Search Terms – English
Table 2 Search Terms – German

Study eligibility

Two main categories of research studies were of primary interest in this review: those relating to Instagram users and young people and depression or symptomatic behaviour of depression. Studies were included if they have been conducted on Instagram users, focusing on the relationship between Instagram and depression or symptoms of depressive behaviour as defined in the DSM-5 criteria [17]. Anxiety, loneliness or low self-esteem with a quantifiable measure of depression meet the inclusion criteria if an explicit link to depression was established in the study goal or derivation. Studies that performed research on social media in general and did not point out Instagram use and its relationship to depression were excluded. Also, there was no restriction to a particular population or geographic region. Table 3 provides a summary of studies eligible for inclusion in the review.

Table 3 Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

Data collection, selection and management

Search results from various databases were aggregated and imported into a data management software (Mendeley) to manage the screening process and selection. Studies that cannot be exported from databases were imported into Excel and manually transferred to Mendeley. Studies were screened based on title, abstract and keywords at the initial rounds and based on the full text at the final suitability stage, as represented in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) flow diagram in Fig. 2. Studies were screened for duplicates. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were first applied only on titles, abstracts and keywords. Those that did not meet the criteria were excluded from the final data synthesis. To ensure uniformity and synchronisation of study selection, an inter-rater reliability test was performed before data extraction.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Study Selection Using PRISMA Flow Diagram [23]

Data extraction & data synthesis

A pilot test on ten articles was conducted by four authors (SW, RS, LT, JB) to determine the uniformity of understanding on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were first applied to titles and abstracts and then full text by four reviewers (SW, RS, LT, JB). For this, the total number of studies screened were divided into roughly equal pots for each reviewer. To ensure inter-rater reliability, a kappa test was conducted [24, 25]. In three runs of 30 cases, results were compared, and disagreements were resolved through discussion between the reviewers. The kappa score rose from 0.93 to 1.00 between the three inter-rater reliability tests. The key study characteristics were collected by all researchers in a self-designed extraction form.

All reviewers undertook the descriptive data synthesis. The relationship between Instagram and depression was described, including a descriptive summary of the characteristics, connecting all the studies’ findings, and exploring relationships between them. Table 4 summarises the most important study characteristics. Also, the extracted data were divided into thematic groups to identify different focuses, sum up relevant outcomes and results, and identify missing research fields. The narrative data synthesis was performed based on CRD’s guidance for undertaking reviews in health care [26].

Table 4 Summary of Study Findings

Quality of evidence and risks of bias in individual studies

The methodological quality of each included studies and risk of bias was appraised by authors using the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool, such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE), to assess the risk of bias in randomized trials [27]. Each study was rated and allocated to one of the four categories (high, medium, low or very low quality). Each included study was rated by two authors, independently of one another. Two studies that did not meet the criteria for quality were excluded from the final data synthesis. As a result, nine studies were included for the data synthesis.


The selection process in the review based on the number of studies screened, assessed for eligibility, and included at each stage, is displayed in Fig. 2.

Study characteristics

Scientific journal articles (peer-reviewed) published between 2010 and 2018 forms the primary inclusion studies assessed. Two studies explored the link between Instagram and depression in women only [28, 29]. Two studies examined mostly women: 84% female participants; 78% female participants [7, 30]. The study designs varied between questionnaires [30,31,32,33,34,35] and methodological triangulation [28, 32]. As seen in Table 4, most of the studies used already tested scales like the Beck Depression Inventory for Measuring, Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale or the Iowa- Netherlands Comparison Orientation Measure. Study assessment showed that five studies were of moderate quality and four of low quality (see Table 5). See Table 6 in Appendix for definitions (High/Moderate/Low/Very Low). Table 4 below shows the nine eligible studies based on the selection criteria.

Table 5 Study Quality and Risk of Bias


The analysis revealed that there is a correlation between Instagram use and depression. Three main factors were considered in the studies. Firstly, the subject’s condition, like prior depressive symptoms or other related behaviours or gender and age. Secondly, the use of Instagram, namely how frequently or in comparison to other social media such as Facebook or Twitter or by the kind of use, like following many strangers or passively browsing or actively posting. The third dimension is less about establishing the connection between Instagram and depression but finding mediators that explain why this effect exists. Factors such as social comparison, peer feedback, self-esteem or loneliness became significant.

Instagram and depression

How Instagram is used varies from user to user. On the one hand, a differentiation between passive consumption, i.e. browsing and broadcasting, posting and direct communication such as liking a post [34]. On the other hand, Instagram usage can be divided into passive, active and interactive categories [30].

Focusing on different types of Instagram use and adolescents’ depressed mood, a longitudinal two-wave panel among 12–19-year-old Flemish adolescents show that browsing leads to depressed mood and depressed mood leads to a higher posting behavior on Instagram [34]. In contrast, posting is not therapeutic for depression. Transversal analytical research from Lima, Perú shows that “the use of Instagram is [...] associated with increased risk of suffering from depressive symptoms [...]” [33]. Furthermore, measuring depressive symptoms and the dependence on social media of 212 students, results show that “there is an association between social media dependence and depressive symptoms” [33]. Using an adapted Internet addiction test to identify social media dependence, almost 70% of the 82 participating students measured had depressive symptoms [33].

Instagram vs. other social networking sites

While studies have shown that other social networking sites are related to depression [36,37,38], it seems reasonable for studies to examine if Instagram has distinct correlations with depression compared to other social networking sites due to its different nature in being an image-based platform. How strong is this relationship between Instagram and depression compared to other social networking sites like Facebook or Twitter?

In contrast to the correlation between Instagram and depression, users with symptoms of depression prefer Twitter over Instagram because Facebook has a protective character when it comes to depression [33]. This could be attributed to a couple of features put in place by Facebook to eliminate or reduce the negative impacts on mental well-being compared to other social media platforms, especially among young people. For example, people that connect on Facebook are friends and family who are known to each other. Besides, connections on Facebook only occurs upon the validation of an invite. Hence, the conclusion that although Facebook was the most used social media site among the 212 private university students sampled, results show that “the prioritized use of Facebook had a lower tendency of suffering from depressive symptoms” compared to Twitter and Instagram [33]. While the study has argued that Facebook is associated less with depression, the finding is not conclusive. This is because there is ample opportunity to explore further this aspect by obtaining data from other sources other than the 212 private university students sampled.

While Twitter makes users with depressive symptoms feel like someone is listening to them, undoubtedly, Instagram helps people perceive self-acceptance and elevating their low self-esteem by sharing of photos with people all over the world. This might be why Instagram is attractive to people in general. On the other hand, Instagram is at greater risk to increase the negative effects of social comparison, next to depression.

Another insight using a demographic questionnaire in conjunction with three measurements: The Perceived Stress Scale, the Beck Anxiety Inventory, and the Beck Depression Inventory-II on 440 adolescents and young adults from 440 families in Eghlid City in Iran [31]. Non-users of social media have a significantly lower level of depressive indicators (M = 21.00 SD = 11.64) than social media users [31]. While WhatsApp has the lowest (M = 22.79 SD = 12.79); Viber, Telegram and Facebook have moderate levels; and Instagram (M = 30.42 SD = 16.71), Line (M = 31.09 SD = 11.02) and Tango (M = 35.28 SD = 14.66) have the highest level of depressive indicators [31].

Gender, age and self-esteem

While anxiety levels varied between age groups as well as gender, females and adolescents having higher anxiety, depression and stress levels didn‘t differ significantly [28, 31]. Females and older teens, in general, spend more time on social networking sites. However, older teens exhibit a more positive effect than general females’ lower positive effects [32]. Hence, factors that lead to depression might be more associated with women than others.

The time spent on Instagram correlated positively with depressive symptoms and trait anxiety, social comparison orientation, appearance anxiety and body image disturbance and low self-esteem, in a study exploring the relationship between Instagram and mental health well-being in 129 women at the Federation University in Australia [28]. Also, the number of Instagram followers was positively associated with depression, trait anxiety and low self-esteem. As participants’ age increased, Instagram use decreased [28]. Similarly, exposure to images decreased self-rated attractiveness, implying that participants engaged in the reassessment of their notion of attractiveness and rated themselves accordingly” [28]. Hence, decreased self-rated attractiveness is associated with higher depressive symptoms, general anxiety, physical appearance consciousness, and body dissatisfaction. These social networking sites (SNS) act as aggregators for idealized imagery. Therefore, given unlimited access to other users’ profiles, people are likely to engage in social comparisons.

Since age correlated negatively with Instagram use, effects might be more potent in adolescents who were not part of the sample. Also, those in the fitness and beauty groups are less likely to indulge in self-rated physical appearance because even brief exposure to idealized imagery can affect the self-assessment of one’s appearance, linked to psychological well- being.

Examining the importance of peer feedback among girls on Instagram, in the form of comments, likes and number of followers, show that girls with low self-esteem are more reliant on peer feedback [29]. “The level of importance placed on receiving feedback can be considered as the magnitude to which girls stake their self-worth on the external contingencies” [29]. So, poor or insufficient feedback can lead to depressive moods. Although, this is not equated with depression but precursor-like other depressive symptoms. The importance of peer feedback is positively linked to problem-focused coping (direct action to remove the stressor) and negatively to emotion-focused coping (to minimize negative feelings) [29].

“Girls place high importance on both the number of likes and positive comments they receive. Teenage girls with low self-esteem attach higher importance to peer feedback, and the level of such importance is positively associated with depressed mood and vice versa” [29].

Therefore, peer feedback on Instagram acts as a significant predictor for behaviour effects (negative and positive).

In summary, there are indications that younger users are at higher risks, and self-rating is an essential factor when talking about Instagram and depression since it is image-based. Also, peer feedback significantly affects young teenagers’ self-esteem.

Social comparison

Social networking sites do not only connect people from all over the world, but they also allow users to compare themselves with others. Among all, adolescents tend to compare themselves with other individuals to learn about themselves [39]. It is reasonable to ask whether teenagers are more susceptible to depressive symptoms than adults.

Taking a closer look at depressive symptoms and social comparison among 117 Instagram users between 18 and 29 years old, “a theoretically grounded moderated mediation of the association between Instagram use and depressive symptoms through the mechanism of negative social comparison” [7]. The goal is a focus on the number of strangers the user followed and its moderating role. The findings show that the number of strangers an Instagram user follows moderates the association between Instagram use and depressive symptoms. That is, “at the highest level of strangers followed only, more frequent Instagram use had direct associations with greater depressive symptoms, while for those at lower levels of strangers followed, Instagram use and depressive symptoms were unrelated” [7]. In other words, if users follow a lot of people they do not know in real life, they tend to have negative psychological effects by comparing themselves to others. In the end, this evidence shows some form of relationship between Instagram use and depressive symptoms.

Assessing an experimental design with pre-post surveys and interviews, examining the role of negative comparisons in the relationship between Instagram browsing and affective well-being immediately post-browsing in 507 students from one suburban public high school in the North-eastern United States [7]. Teens who engage in more negative comparison in response to Instagram use suffers greater threat to well-being. At the same time, targeted interventions (e.g. clarifying that only the best images are posted) held promise for mitigating social browsing toll among vulnerable youth [32]. The findings suggest differential susceptibility among adolescents to social media effects. Teenagers who perceived the people and objects in the feed as happy as they are with their lives didn‘t feel worse. I.e., people with high self-esteem perceive feeds better and don‘t get depressed. In contrast, while those with lower self-esteem who perceive feeds as happier than themselves get more depressed [32]. Therefore, this assessment further deepens the prior analysis, showing how self-esteem, social comparison, and depression are interlinked.

Similarly, looking at the role of social comparison in the use of Instagram among emerging adults found on the one hand that “social comparison on Instagram mediated the relationship between contingent self-worth and self-esteem “but also, that “self-worth contingent on approval from others moderated the relationship between intensity of Instagram use and social comparison” [35]. In other words, the intensity of Instagram use is influenced by the user’s self-worth, which depends upon the others’ approval.

High self-esteem might protect one from negative effects of social comparison and, thus, getting depressive symptoms. But if one’s self-esteem depends on others’ approval, people use Instagram more intensively, which leads to a greater level of social comparison, consequently [35]. Therefore, using social networking sites can damage self-esteem, especially when young people seek approval and validation from others [35]. However, Instagram does not have direct effects on self-esteem [35]. Nevertheless, self-worth and self-esteem are important symptoms; one must not underestimate when researching the connection between Instagram and depression.

Also, loneliness appears to be one of the important symptoms of depression [30, 40]. In evaluating the association between different types of Instagram use, loneliness and social comparison orientation, by analysing 208 graduate students’ self-report surveys. Although passive activities are related to higher loneliness and lower well-being in general [30, 40, 41], findings show that “both Instagram interaction [...] and Instagram browsing [...] were related to lower loneliness, whereas Instagram broadcasting was associated with higher loneliness” [30]. According to Social Comparison Orientation (SCO) theory, some people tend to make comparisons more than others [39]. Therefore, in this analysis, SCO associates the relationship between Instagram interaction and loneliness. I.e., social comparison related more to Instagram interaction and browsing, but not to Instagram broadcasting.

Therefore, Interactive and passive types of using Instagram (interaction and browsing) are related to lower loneliness; whereas, broadcasting, an active type of Instagram activity, was related to higher loneliness. It is possible that browsing Instagram may not be as passive as it seems. Still, it connotes actual interaction, showing that Instagram interaction of any shape espouses a feeling of connectedness, hence less loneliness. Thus, depending on how the platform was used, Instagram can lead to higher and lower loneliness.

Influence of Instagram on User’s behaviour

Most of the evidence reviewed tend to support the negative outcome of Instagram on the user’s behaviour. A study conducted in the United States of America observed that browsing and interacting through Instagram brings about lower loneliness in users, while broadcasting on Instagram causes higher loneliness. This suggests that Instagram users are subjected to behavioural isolation [30]. Similarly, another study conducted in Iran asserted that online social environment influences social media users’ emotional state [31]. This view suggests further that the information made available through the online social environment in the form of pictures and images are instrumental in describing user’s behaviour. Both indicate that inactive behaviours in Instagram activities due to its restriction to pictures and images sharing tend to displace face-to-face interaction and its benefits.

Similarly, another study conducted in Belgium found that Instagram stimulates negative comparison behaviours in users, which may increase young people’s depressed mood [34]. This aligned with the one conducted in Singapore, which affirms a relationship between online peer information and teenage users’ behaviour on Instagram [29]. This is because the feedback they receive via social media influences their mood and emotion. Hence, Australia’s conclusion that, the more frequent people use social media such as Instagram, the more it influences users’ psychological behaviour. That is, excessive Instagram use impact users negatively [28].

Some others view this phenomenon from plural points, not necessarily from one-way Instagram influence on user’s behaviour. A study from New York found that frequent Instagram users who follow anonymous people often experience negative associations, while a positive association is experienced by users who follow fewer strangers [7]. This is in line with another analysis from the United States of America, which concluded that users’ online social information often predicts their followers’ behaviour negatively or positively [32]. These views suggest that both the users and their information in the online environment could positively or negatively influence an individual’s experience and emotional state. Also, Instagram affects users from both developed and developing economies in almost the same way.


This paper aimed to examine causal relations between Instagram and depression by synthesizing studies relating to depressive symptoms and Instagram. Significant conclusions are that:

First, Instagram and depression are interlinked. Regarding the body of evidence, it seems that in general, Instagram usage intensifies depressive and related symptoms compared to non-users of Instagram and users of other social media. Also, negative effects on psychological well-being could occur immediately after exposure to Instagram contents, especially since the frequency of Instagram use correlates with depressive symptoms. However, it must be stated that the reasons for this correlation are not exhaustively explored yet. It could also be that depressive symptoms increase Instagram use [34].

Also, some findings have shown positive sides of using Instagram, such as feeling less lonely or connecting to people worldwide, as well as receiving positive peer feedback or positive social comparison, which prevent depressive symptoms. I.e., Instagram is a double-edged sword; it can help people with depressive symptoms getting self-acceptance and elevating their low self-esteem by sharing photos. On the other hand, Instagram poses a greater risk of increasing negative effects of social comparison and depression. Hence, users who do not receive good feedback are likely to experience depressive moods.

Second, it can be said that multiple variables influence (moderate or mediate) the connection between Instagram and depression, most notably the number of strangers one follows on Instagram and the level of social comparison. In other words, how people with depressive symptoms interact on (other) social networking sites, how they communicate with peers or how much peer feedback they receive offline must be considered to determine the effects on depression. While Facebook users are mostly connected with friends, Instagram can intensify negative effects of social comparison with strangers. Since Instagram is filled with model-like posing pictures and filtered photographs worldwide, some users might not feel good enough.

The review found different susceptibility among adolescents to social media effects. Teenagers with high self-esteem didn‘t get depressed, while those with lower self-esteem got more depressed by the same content. This could also explain why low self-rated attractiveness is associated with higher results for depressive behaviour. Also, social comparison on Instagram explained the relationship between self-worth and self-esteem. If one's self-esteem depends on others’ approval, people use Instagram more and indulge in higher social comparison.

Third, the distinction between different types of Instagram use is important for understanding the phenomenon and the nuances under review. Interactive and passive use of Instagram (interaction and browsing) is related to lower loneliness. In contrast, broadcasting, an active type of Instagram activity, was related to higher loneliness. Therefore, further research seeking to validate these findings is needed. Also, one should not underestimate social media dependence, which associates clearly with depressive symptoms.

Fourth, most studies did not point out the differences between gender (male and female) concerning Instagram and depression. However, indications have been found that female users are at higher risk of anxiety and exhibit lower positive effect. Also, insufficient feedback for girls who perceive greater importance on peer feedback are more likely to develop depressed mood.

Fifth, age wasn’t directly linked to depressive behaviour, but younger users are linked to a higher risk of anxiety, while older users exhibit higher positive effect. Using social networking sites potentially negatively affects self-esteem, especially when young people seek approval and validation from others. It might be helpful to conduct further research on Instagram users’ age and symptoms of depression.

Finally, depression comes in different ways. While some studies explore depression as a concept, some studies illuminate only constituent parts of depression, such as loneliness or self-esteem and self-worth. Future studies should examine depression in relation to loneliness, self-worth, self-esteem, and anxiety in connection with Instagram usage.

While social media or social networking sites should not be regulated in any form, there is need to promote behaviour or self-agency that makes users conscious of its impact on their mental wellbeing, especially young people. It is improtant to be mindful that social media could become adictive, hence, watch the habits. Time spent on social media platforms must be limited vis-à-vis other activities. It is advisable to connect only with people or things that promote or inspire positive actions.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available upon request.


  1. Sheldon P, Bryant K. Instagram: motives for its use and relationship to narcissism and contextual age. Comput Hum Behav. 2016;58:89–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Statista 2020. Number of monthly active Instagram users from January 2013 to June 2018. (online) Retrieved from: Accessed 22 June 2020.

  3. Marickar S, Rajasekhar D. An analysis of growth and usage patterns of Instagram users for effective brand engagement in the middle east. J Crit Rev. 2019;7(2):266.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Thoumrungroje A. The influence of social media intensity and EWOM on conspicuous consumption. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2014;148:7–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wilcox K, Stephen A. Are close friends the enemy? Online social networks, self-esteem, and self-control. J Consum Res. 2013;40(1):90–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hayes JF, Maughan DL, Grant-Peterkin H. Interconnected or disconnected? Promotion of mental health and prevention of mental disorder in the digital age. Br J Psychiatry. 2016:205–7.

  7. Lup K, Trub L, Rosenthal L. Instagram #instasad?: exploring associations among Instagram use, depressive symptoms, negative social comparison, and strangers followed. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2015;18(5):247–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Khamis S, Ang L, Welling R. Self-branding,‘micro-celebrity’and the rise of social media influencers. Celebrity Stud. 2017;8(2):191–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nandagiri V, Philip L. Impact of influencers from Instagram and YouTube on their followers. Int J Multidiscipl Res Modern Educ. 2018;4(1):61–5.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bhat SA. Social networking sites and mental health: a review. Int J Adv Educ Res. 2017;2(5):357–60.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gilchrist, Karen (2017). ‘Instagram most likely to cause young people to feel depressed and lonely out of major social apps, study says’. CNBC, 2017, May 19. Available at: Accessed Dec. 3, 2020.

  12. Holowka EM. Between artifice and emotion: the “sad girls” of Instagram. Leadership. Popular Cult Soc Change. 2018:183–7.

  13. World Health Organisation (WHO). Mental Health. Depression: Let’s Talk.[24.03.201 9]. Accessed Nov. 33, 2020.

  14. Kessler RC, Bromet EJ. The epidemiology of depression across cultures. Annu Rev Public Health. 2013;34(1):119–38.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Friedrich M. Depression is the leading cause of disability around the world. JAMA. 2017;317(15):1517.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Walker ER, Druss BG. Rate and predictors of persistent major depressive disorder in a nationally representative sample. Community Ment Health J. 2015;51(6):701–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. American Psychiatric Association (APA). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5®). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Pub; 2013.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Instagram. Welcome to IGTV. 2018.[25.03.2019].

  19. Primack BA, Shensa A, Escobar-Viera CG, Barrett EL, Sidani JE, Colditz JB, et al. Use of multiple social media platforms and symptoms of depression and anxiety: a nationally- representative study among US young adults. Comput Hum Behav. 2017;69:1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fardouly J, Vartanian LR. Social media and body image concerns: current research and future directions. Curr Opin Psychol. 2016;9:1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Miller SA. PICO worksheet and search strategy. US National Center Dental Hygiene Res. 2001.

  22. O’Connor D, Green S, Higgins JPT. Defining the review question and developing criteria for including studies. In: Green S, Higgins JPT, editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Chichester: Wiley; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. The PRISMA group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Fleiss JL. Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. New York Psychol Bull. 1971;76(5):378–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. New York Educ Psychol Measure. 1960;20(1):37–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Center for Reviews and Dissemination (CRD). Guidance for undertaking reviews in health care: University of York: Center for Reviews and Dissemination; 2008.

  27. Higgins JPT, Altman Douglas G, on behalf of the Cochrane Statistical Methods Group and the Cochrane Bias Methods Group. Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Green S, Higgins JPT, editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Chichester: Wiley; 2008.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Sherlock M, Wagstaff DL. Exploring the relationship between frequency of Instagram use, exposure to idealized images, and psychological well-being in women. Psychol Pop Media Cult. 2019;8(4):482–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Li P, Chang L, Chua THH, Loh RSM. “Likes” as KPI: an examination of teenage girls’ perspective on peer feedback on Instagram and its influence on coping response. Telematics Inform. 2018;35(7):1994–2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Yang CC. Instagram use, loneliness, and social comparison orientation: interact and browse on social media, but don't compare. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2016;19(12):703–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Khodarahimi S, Fathi R. The role of online social networking on emotional functioning in a sample of Iranian adolescents and young adults. J Technol Hum Serv. 2017;35(2):120–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Weinstein E. Adolescents' differential responses to social media browsing: exploring causes and consequences for intervention. Comput Hum Behav. 2017;76:396–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Jeri-Yabar, A., Sanchez-Carbonel, A., Tito, K., Ramirez-del Castillo, J., Torres Alcantara, A., Denegri, D. & Carreazo, Y. association between social media use (twitter, Instagram, Facebook) and depressive symptoms: are twitter users at higher risk? Int J Soc Psychiatry, 2019; 65(1), 14–19, DOI:

  34. Frison E, Eggermont S. Browsing, posting and liking on Instagram: the reciprocal relationships between different types of Instagram use and adolescents’ depressed mood. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2017;20(10):603–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Stapleton P, Luiz G, Chatwin H. Generation validation: the role of social comparison in use of Instagram among emerging adults. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2017;20(3):142–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Baker DA, Algorta GP. The relationship between online social networking and depression: a systematic review of quantitative studies. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2016;19(11):638–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Lin LY, Sidani JE, Shensa A, Radovic A, Miller E, Colditz JB, et al. Association between social media use and depression among US young adults. Depress Anxiety. 2016;33(4):323–31.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Krylova D. The impact of social media on depression in 18–34-year- olds in the United StatesDoctoral dissertation, Florida Gulf Coast University; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Festinger L. A theory of social comparison processes. Hum Relat. 1954;7:117–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Yang CC, Robinson A. Not necessarily detrimental: two social comparison orientations and their associations with social media use and college social adjustment. Comput Hum Behav. 2018;84:49–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Yang CC, Lee Y. Interactants and activities on Facebook, Instagram, and twitter: associations between social media use and social adjustment to college. Appl Dev Sci. 2018:1–17.

  42. Balshem, et al. GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(4):401–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


No funds, grants, or other support was received. Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



All authors contributed to the conceptualisation, methodology, search, screening, data extraction, result analysis and writing. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gbadebo Collins Adeyanju.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

All authors have read and consented to the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.



Table 6 Quality of evidence rating [42]

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Adeyanju, G.C., Solfa, R.P., Tran, T.L. et al. Behavioural symptoms of mental health disorder such as depression among young people using Instagram: a systematic review. transl med commun 6, 15 (2021).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: